Bette Davis Image With Her Information Of Lawsuit With Detail By Poetrysync1.blog

In her next movie, forest fossils, (1936), Davis, in his first important role, Leslie Howard and Humphrey Bogart, has received a majority of Bogart and co-starring critical acclaim. Davis has appeared in several films over the next two years, most have received insufficient.

Lawsuit
Her career is confident that it has been damaged by a succession of mediocre films, Davis, accepted the offer in 1936 to appear in two movies in the United Kingdom. She knew that it was in violation of her contract with Warner Brothers, she fled to Canada to avoid the legal document is delivered to her. Eventually, Davis, later hoping Warner Bros. remembered the opening statement of the attorney and her that to get out of her contract, brought her case to the British court, representation Lord Warner Bros. Hastings Patrick Hastings, "there pretty young woman this is a prank that prompted the court to come to the conclusion that it is it is a lot of money that what she wants." He $ 1,350 to her week that it had been paid, by mistake, ridicule Davis description of her contract as a "slave" by showing. He said, "If anyone wants to put me to eternal slavery based on the reward, I do not need to create in order to consider it." Said story was British mass media, in Davis provides the most support was played her as overpaid and ungrateful.

Davis said, explained her point of view to journalists, "If I would not have left worth fighting for career, I've continued to be displayed in this more mundane picture, I, was knew. "Davis lawyers it, she could be, she regardless her personal beliefs, is likely to be called upon to play any part in the range of her ability When her complaints - she with a period of additional suspensions to her contract required to support the party against her beliefs presenting the possibility of being interrupted without pay because it rejects the part, and of her similar to image that could be displayed in any manner, be considered to be applied by the studio. Jack Warner, "she is required to play it, if you have to when she plays, she believes she can whether it is cheap it uncomfortable to play it, the call anything some things you have selected is that? "and testimony, and, asked the Warner" Yes, she must play it. If "and the answer was determined by Branson J. English High Court was reported as V of Warner Bros. Studios, Inc.. Nelson [1937] at 209 Davis debt to one kilobytes, without revenue, lost the case, went back to Hollywood, to resume her career. Olivia de Havilland was wearing a similar case in 1943.